VCS Commentator Speaks Out Amid Controversial Gen.G Decisions
During the decisive match between T1 and AL, Gen.G made a surprising pick by selecting Blitzcrank as their support champion. Although this choice aligns with Duro’s style, the effectiveness of this champion can be quite limited. Particularly at critical moments, AL had champions that could easily disengage or counteract Blitzcrank’s abilities. Additionally, commentator K.N, known for his insights in the VCS, remarked: “What does picking Blitzcrank even do? Who can he pull?”
It’s worth mentioning that afterward, Duro also faced significant pressure with this choice, severely limiting AL’s gameplay and ultimately leading to their defeat. Additionally, Duro experienced a situation where he was unable to pull Hope at a critical moment. Almost immediately, the commentary from the League of Legends community, particularly from Gen.G fans, began to escalate. Following this, during the subsequent match between T1 and BLG, K.N had to publicly apologize for his earlier remarks.
Following this incident, the commentator’s article raised questions about the potential use of AI to generate content. Moreover, prior to this, K.N had also challenged the community, but many critics pointed out that the commentary on Gen.G’s match could lead to increased scrutiny from the League of Legends community.
Valuable Lessons for VCS Commentators
It is undeniable that Gen.G faced significant challenges, particularly with the Fearless Draft strategy, where choices become limited as matches progress to game five. However, with the choice of Blitzcrank, Duro typically faced numerous difficulties that could not be overlooked. Moreover, when selecting a support champion, it is essential to ensure that the champion can effectively fulfill their role in the game. Commentators should also strive to provide observations or comments that are more objective.
In 2025, due to various dramas, many VCS commentators have encountered complex issues. From this point on, the community has developed differing perspectives on commentators, and these individuals must recognize the need for improvement if they wish to pursue their careers seriously.
