In a recent discussion on a dedicated forum for anime enthusiasts, a fan expressed their opinion on which anime should never have sequels, whether in the form of a second season or a movie. The lively exchange of ideas has sparked numerous threads on the platform.
Many participants in the forum raised several reasons that led them to believe that some sequels could disappoint dedicated fans. One of the most frequently mentioned reasons is that sequels often lack the compelling narrative and unique essence that made the original series popular. In many cases, fans feel that the storyline has peaked in the first season, and continuing it only dilutes the quality of the content or explores unnecessary plot lines.
Additionally, some fans voiced their frustration with sequels that seem to be created primarily for commercial purposes rather than driven by a meaningful story or character development. This often leads to a sense of detachment from the sequel, making it feel like a mere cash grab rather than a genuine continuation of the tale.
Another important point raised in the forum discussion is that poorly executed sequels can harm the overall perception of the original series. If the sequel’s quality drops significantly—whether in animation, character development, or storytelling—it can negatively impact how fans view the entire franchise and leave them feeling let down and tired.
Below is a summary of some fan opinions on anime that should not have sequels:
– The first season of “Yakusoku no Neverland” was truly shocking, although I haven’t read the manga. However, I’ve heard it’s a great adaptation. Sadly, the second season has missed the mark. The transition from manga to anime has generally been disastrous and lacks any meaningful substance. According to manga purists, the second season skips over some key character developments and plot points from the manga. Therefore, I recommend watching the first season and skipping the second; it’s better to read the manga instead.
– With “Eureka Seven AO,” I was initially excited, but my enthusiasm waned as the series progressed.
– “Tokyo Ghoul: Root A” is entirely different from the manga. The plot and character arcs were significantly altered, which disappointed me. If I weren’t already invested, I would have found the animation disappointing in capturing the creator’s original vision and deviating from the source material.
– “Dagashi Kashi.” Last year, I watched the first season and enjoyed getting acquainted with various dagashi snacks. I tried to watch the second season but didn’t like it at all. I think the pacing of the episodes was a terrible idea. Also, I wasn’t fond of the direction some main characters took by the final episodes. I preferred the art style of the first season much more than the second, even though the second season stayed closer to the manga.
– The second season of “Re:ZERO.” The pacing was slow, the dialogue was tedious, and some awkward moments made me feel bored or simply disheartened.
– I have no interest in the second or third seasons of “DanMachi.”
– I haven’t enjoyed “Code Geass” season two. Initially, it had high points, but by episode 8, it started to decline drastically.
– Not all seasons are bad, but the final part of “Mob Psycho 100” season two left me disappointed.
– “HameFura” was a show I quite enjoyed in its first season, but I feel the subsequent season went in a different direction and lost most of what I liked about it.
– “Nanatsu no Taizai” season three. I will never forget what they did with Escanor and Meliodas.
– “Index” Season 3. It made me feel I had to go back and reread the “Toaru” series.
