If there is a central character in anime that can stir the most significant controversy within the fan community, it is undoubtedly Eren Yeager. This character is not simply layered in shades of gray but is rather steeped in darkness. Attack on Titan by Hajime Isayama highlights Eren’s journey from a hopeful youth to a conflicted figure immersed in vengeance.
After following a character from the very beginning, any viewer will inevitably become attached to them. Therefore, when one suddenly discovers that their beloved character is a ruthless, calculating individual, everyone must grapple with the implications. In a recent interview, Hajime Isayama explained how he views Eren.
Hajime Isayama’s Perspective on Eren
In an interview with a French broadcaster, Hajime Isayama delved deep into Attack on Titan and the meaning it holds for him. The author was asked to explain what Eren represents to him. In a concise and profound manner, the mangaka responded:
“I think he is a character that reflects my own dark side. Therefore, the entire story revolves around the fact that I have to erase these dark parts of myself.”
Indeed, the creator of Attack on Titan has acknowledged that Eren embodies the darker aspects of his personality. While the narrative may portray Eren as justified and a representation of his actions, the creator has clearly acknowledged the complexity of this character.
Hajime Isayama on His Perspectives Post-Attack on Titan
Due to the inherent nature of Attack on Titan and its dark narrative elements related to the story, it is easy to suggest that the author is a pessimist. Eren’s viewpoint on the world certainly supports this notion. However, the creator has clarified that this is not the case and that he identifies as an optimist.
Hajime Isayama shares: “Personally, I tend to be more optimistic. And I believe that humanity, in reality, can be shaped by making the right choices.”
If Isayama is indeed an optimist, then why does Attack on Titan have the potential to disturb anyone who watches it? The answer lies in the fact that the author understands that while being optimistic is a good perspective, it isn’t always the best approach for storytelling. He prefers to present a more realistic perspective.
According to the author, every story should have its own flavor within Attack on Titan, should he write it with any definitive approach. He wants to make the manga more compelling. He also discusses the inherent conflict between good and evil in the world.
“I believe that a perfect hero will inevitably lose their flavor.”, the author states.
Eren must evolve according to his own beliefs, not merely because it’s right, but because in the struggle between good and evil, he must be the one to take charge and choose the path that offers him the most freedom. At the same time, the meaning of that choice is not straightforward; his approach is unique.
